Sample analysis report

Explore a sample report with facial proportions, eye angles and styling ideas.

PSL reference score5.2/ 8.0

High Tier Normie / HTN

1.03.5MTN5.0HTN6.0Chadlite8.0

A community band described as having clear contours and cohesive facial proportions.

Your result at a glance

Angularity scores highest in this photo. Prioritize reviewing Mouth / nose span.

Harmony5.6/8

Dimorphism5.0/8

Angularity5.9/8

Miscellaneous4.6/8

A 1.0–8.0 scale, with four dimensions and inspectable geometric measurements.

Top strengths

Strength

Right projected jaw angle

145.6°

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.354

Model contribution ranges: 135.7° – 160.0°

Photo-right visible jaw angle: larger angles form a softer corner.

Left projected jaw angle

144.4°

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.272

Model contribution ranges: 134.1° – 135.1° or 136.1° – 168.5°

Photo-left visible jaw angle: larger angles form a softer corner.

Priority focus

Focus

Mouth / nose span

1.099

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.394

Model contribution ranges: 1.367 – 1.586

Mouth width relative to the measured nose span.

Chin / cheek span

0.466

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.221

Model contribution ranges: 0.412 – 0.444

Visible chin span relative to cheek span.

Green segments mark ranges with a positive contribution in the current model's frozen feature curve, not a population-wide ideal range. The marker is your photo measurement; its spread models point-placement sensitivity, not a confidence interval for lighting or pose.

Your measurement-backed action plan

Try the strongest evidence-backed adjustments first. Each card links the action to your measured proportions.

Grooming & brows

Measurement evidence

Mouth / nose span1.099

Keep the lip outline tidy; if you already wear a moustache, avoid hiding the mouth corners.

Visual aim: Show the full mouth width relative to the measured nose span.

Camera & lighting

Measurement evidence

Nose midline offset0.009

Center the camera and match light on both sides; retake with a relaxed expression before changing styling.

Visual aim: Check whether the observed left-right difference persists under matched conditions.

See what each line means.

Select a ratio to highlight its measurement on your photo.

Brow-to-lip FWHR

1.807

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.022

Model contribution ranges: 1.726 – 2.100

Cheek span relative to brow-to-upper-lip height.

Eye spacing / cheek span

0.490

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.216

Model contribution ranges: 0.455 – 0.517

Iris-center spacing as a share of visible face width.

Eye-to-mouth / cheek span

0.520

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.056

Model contribution ranges: 0.491 – 0.506 or 0.512 – 0.637

Eye-line-to-mouth distance as a share of face width.

Mid-to-lower facial ratio

1.006

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.133

Model contribution ranges: 0.976 – 1.491

Measured middle section height relative to the lower section.

Jaw / cheek span

0.782

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.027

Model contribution ranges: 0.733 – 0.807 or 0.833 – 0.868

Visible jaw span relative to cheek span.

Chin / cheek span

0.466

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.221

Model contribution ranges: 0.412 – 0.444

Visible chin span relative to cheek span.

Eye opening aspect

0.301

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.149

Model contribution ranges: 0.312 – 0.523

Eye opening height relative to its width, averaged across both eyes.

Mouth / nose span

1.099

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.394

Model contribution ranges: 1.367 – 1.586

Mouth width relative to the measured nose span.

Left projected jaw angle

144.4°

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.272

Model contribution ranges: 134.1° – 135.1° or 136.1° – 168.5°

Photo-left visible jaw angle: larger angles form a softer corner.

Right projected jaw angle

145.6°

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.354

Model contribution ranges: 135.7° – 160.0°

Photo-right visible jaw angle: larger angles form a softer corner.

Left canthal tilt

6.2°

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: +0.122

Model contribution ranges: 1.2° – 2.2° or 5.7° – 11.1°

Photo-left outer eye corner angle relative to the iris line.

Right canthal tilt

6.9°

Neutral contribution

Score contribution: 0.000

Measurement only; current scoring weight is 0

Photo-right outer eye corner angle relative to the iris line.

Eye width asymmetry

0.022

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.042

Model contribution ranges: 0.000 – 0.055 or 0.153 – 0.389

Difference between visible eye widths relative to their average.

Jaw span asymmetry

0.061

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: +0.015

Model contribution ranges: 0.000 – 0.029 or 0.051 – 0.143 or 0.178 – 0.215

Difference between left and right jaw spans relative to total jaw width.

Nose midline offset

0.009

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.099

Model contribution ranges: 0.020 – 0.043 or 0.080 – 0.231

Nose point distance from the measured center line, relative to face width.

Mouth midline offset

0.011

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: -0.001

Model contribution ranges: 0.005 – 0.007 or 0.023 – 0.151

Mouth center distance from the measured center line, relative to face width.

Your eye profile

Almond-like, elongated outline

A relatively elongated opening pairs with a level-to-upward average corner angle, giving your eye outline an almond-like character.

Near a type boundary; small landmark variations can change the label. Compare the detected corners and ranges below.

How this profile is selected

Shape labels follow fixed outline rules: Hunter-like uses mean tilt ≥ 2° and eye height/width ≤ 0.29; almond-like uses mean tilt ≥ −1° and height/width ≤ 0.35. Opposite side angles beyond ±1° take priority as contrasting directions. Otherwise, mean tilt above +1°, below −1°, or between them selects upturned, downturned, or level-leaning. With only corner measurements, the profile uses direction alone. Hunter-like and almond-like describe resemblance from tilt and aperture; eyelid exposure and socket depth are not inputs. PSL and the four scores continue to use their existing model curves.

Mean canthal angle+6.6°Eye height / width: 0.301Difference between sides: 0.7°

Your eyes, in detail.

Both eyes, measured against the same iris reference line.

Photo-left eye

6.2°Range crosses 0°; check points

Point sensitivity range: -1.0° – 13.4°

Photo-right eye

6.9°Range crosses 0°; check points

Point sensitivity range: -0.2° – 14.0°

The angle range models 2-pixel placement variation at each eye corner plus the iris-reference-line variation. Smaller eyes in the working image produce a wider range. A range crossing 0° calls for checking the points; it does not establish a level angle.

Left / right describe the photo. Difference between sides: 0.7°

Eye measurements in your four dimensions

Left canthal tilt

6.2°

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: +0.122

Model contribution ranges: 1.2° – 2.2° or 5.7° – 11.1°

Photo-left outer eye corner angle relative to the iris line.

Right canthal tilt

6.9°

Neutral contribution

Score contribution: 0.000

Measurement only; current scoring weight is 0

Photo-right outer eye corner angle relative to the iris line.

Eye opening aspect

0.301

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.149

Model contribution ranges: 0.312 – 0.523

Eye opening height relative to its width, averaged across both eyes.

Eye spacing / cheek span

0.490

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.216

Model contribution ranges: 0.455 – 0.517

Iris-center spacing as a share of visible face width.

Eye width asymmetry

0.022

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.042

Model contribution ranges: 0.000 – 0.055 or 0.153 – 0.389

Difference between visible eye widths relative to their average.

Haircuts to try next

Pick a style to preview on your photo.

Browse hairstyles

Card preview

Your score, four dimensions, one high-resolution card. Created on this device.