Sample analysis report

Your measurements and personal styling plan, all in one report.

PSL reference score5.0/ 8.0

Mid Tier Normie / MTN

1.03.5MTN5.0HTN6.0Chadlite8.0

The average baseline representing the majority of the population. Balanced but everyday facial features without striking angularity.

Your result at a glance

Harmony scores highest in this photo. Prioritize reviewing Nose midline offset.

Harmony5.5/8

Dimorphism4.8/8

Angularity4.7/8

Symmetry5.0/8

A 1.0–8.0 scale, with four dimensions and inspectable geometric measurements.

Top strengths

Strength

Eye-to-mouth / cheek span

0.559

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.308

Golden reference ranges: 0.491 – 0.506 or 0.512 – 0.637

Eye-line-to-mouth distance as a share of face width.

Eye spacing / cheek span

0.504

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.216

Golden reference ranges: 0.455 – 0.517

Iris-center spacing as a share of visible face width.

Priority focus

Focus

Nose midline offset

0.012

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.099

Golden reference ranges: 0.020 – 0.043 or 0.080 – 0.231

Nose point distance from the measured center line, relative to face width.

Mouth / nose span

1.278

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.095

Golden reference ranges: 1.367 – 1.586

Mouth width relative to the measured nose span.

The green bar highlights the community golden aesthetic range. The vertical marker shows your photo measurement, and the thin spread indicates minor lighting or pose variations.

Your measurement-backed action plan

Try the strongest evidence-backed adjustments first. Each card links the action to your measured proportions.

Camera & lighting

Measurement evidence

Nose midline offset0.012

Center the camera and match light on both sides; retake with a relaxed expression before changing styling.

Visual aim: Check whether the observed left-right difference persists under matched conditions.

Grooming & brows

Measurement evidence

Mouth / nose span1.278

Keep the lip outline tidy; if you already wear a moustache, avoid hiding the mouth corners.

Visual aim: Show the full mouth width relative to the measured nose span.

Frames & accessories

Measurement evidence

Left projected jaw angle132.1°

Right projected jaw angle131.1°

Compare rounded frames and gently curved accessories.

Visual aim: Soften the visual emphasis of a wider or sharper jaw outline.

Hair silhouette

Measurement evidence

Brow-to-lip FWHR1.506

Keep crown height controlled and add moderate volume at the sides.

Visual aim: More horizontal framing around a narrower measured face.

See what each line means.

Select a ratio to highlight its measurement on your photo.

Brow-to-lip FWHR

1.506

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.016

Golden reference ranges: 1.726 – 2.100

Cheek span relative to brow-to-upper-lip height.

Eye spacing / cheek span

0.504

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.216

Golden reference ranges: 0.455 – 0.517

Iris-center spacing as a share of visible face width.

Eye-to-mouth / cheek span

0.559

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.308

Golden reference ranges: 0.491 – 0.506 or 0.512 – 0.637

Eye-line-to-mouth distance as a share of face width.

Mid-to-lower facial ratio

1.067

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.149

Golden reference ranges: 0.976 – 1.491

Measured middle section height relative to the lower section.

Jaw / cheek span

0.830

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: -0.049

Golden reference ranges: 0.733 – 0.807 or 0.833 – 0.868

Visible jaw span relative to cheek span.

Chin / cheek span

0.454

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.058

Golden reference ranges: 0.412 – 0.444

Visible chin span relative to cheek span.

Eye opening aspect

0.322

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: +0.249

Golden reference ranges: 0.312 – 0.523

Eye opening height relative to its width, averaged across both eyes.

Mouth / nose span

1.278

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.095

Golden reference ranges: 1.367 – 1.586

Mouth width relative to the measured nose span.

Left projected jaw angle

132.1°

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.086

Golden reference ranges: 134.1° – 135.1° or 136.1° – 168.5°

Photo-left visible jaw angle: larger angles form a softer corner.

Right projected jaw angle

131.1°

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.066

Golden reference ranges: 135.7° – 160.0°

Photo-right visible jaw angle: larger angles form a softer corner.

Left canthal tilt

5.6°

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: -0.025

Golden reference ranges: 1.2° – 2.2° or 5.7° – 11.1°

Photo-left outer eye corner angle relative to the iris line.

Right canthal tilt

6.1°

Neutral contribution

Score contribution: 0.000

Measurement only; current scoring weight is 0

Photo-right outer eye corner angle relative to the iris line.

Eye width asymmetry

0.039

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: +0.102

Golden reference ranges: 0.000 – 0.055 or 0.153 – 0.389

Difference between visible eye widths relative to their average.

Jaw span asymmetry

0.003

Within golden range

Score contribution: +0.004

Golden reference ranges: 0.000 – 0.029 or 0.051 – 0.143 or 0.178 – 0.215

Difference between left and right jaw spans relative to total jaw width.

Nose midline offset

0.012

Priority focus area

Score contribution: -0.099

Golden reference ranges: 0.020 – 0.043 or 0.080 – 0.231

Nose point distance from the measured center line, relative to face width.

Mouth midline offset

0.007

Near reference boundary

Near boundary; check point placement

Score contribution: -0.000

Golden reference ranges: 0.005 – 0.007 or 0.023 – 0.151

Mouth center distance from the measured center line, relative to face width.

Your eye profile

Almond-like, elongated outline

A relatively elongated opening pairs with a level-to-upward average corner angle, giving your eye outline an almond-like character.

How this profile is selected

Shape labels follow fixed outline rules: Hunter-like uses mean tilt ≥ 2° and eye height/width ≤ 0.29; almond-like uses mean tilt ≥ −1° and height/width ≤ 0.35. Opposite side angles beyond ±1° take priority as contrasting directions. Otherwise, mean tilt above +1°, below −1°, or between them selects upturned, downturned, or level-leaning. With only corner measurements, the profile uses direction alone. Hunter-like and almond-like describe resemblance from tilt and aperture; eyelid exposure and socket depth are not inputs. PSL and the four scores continue to use their existing model curves.

Mean canthal angle+5.9°Eye height / width: 0.322Difference between sides: 0.5°

Your eyes, in detail.

Both eyes, measured against the same iris reference line.

Photo-left eye

5.6°Range crosses 0°; check points

Point sensitivity range: -0.6° – 11.8°

Photo-right eye

6.1°Positive tilt

Point sensitivity range: 0.1° – 12.2°

The angle range models 2-pixel placement variation at each eye corner plus the iris-reference-line variation. Smaller eyes in the working image produce a wider range. A range crossing 0° calls for checking the points; it does not establish a level angle.

Left / right describe the photo. Difference between sides: 0.5°

Eye measurements in your four dimensions

The green bar highlights the community golden aesthetic range. The vertical marker shows your photo measurement, and the thin spread indicates minor lighting or pose variations.